Gypsy folk-tales — Edition Insights

(8 User reviews)   2598
In Category - Fairy Tales
Groome, Francis Hindes, 1851-1902 Project Gutenberg 2023 Not confirmed
Fairy tales; Tales -- England; Romanies -- Folklore Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 165,604
Reading time 721 min
Text sections 133

The catalog record for Gypsy folk-tales — Edition Insights provides practical reading context through 165,604 words, 12 hr 1 min estimated reading time, and 133 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 14.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Fairy tales,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Francis Hindes Groome's 1899 collection of Gypsy folk-tales, drawn from multiple European traditions, features tales of devils, cunning, and moral reckoning. The editor's preface and footnotes reveal a philological and comparative approach, while the stories themselves showcase stark dialogue, repetitive structures, and motifs like blinding and supernatural eavesdropping.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

loak across the shoulder, rings in their ears, and a long veil on their head. One of them gave birth to a child in the market-place, and at the end of three days went on to rejoin her people.’

On 7th August the same band, now swelled to two hundred, arrived at Forli, where, writes the city chronicler, ‘some [3] said they were from India.’ The Vatican archives may contain some record of the audience granted to these strange penitents by Pope Martin v.; all that we know is that later in the same year the ‘cunning and lazy strange people called Zigeiner,’ led by Duke Michael, were back in Switzerland with papal as well as imperial safe-conducts. And next, after a gap of nearly five years, in the August of 1427 there appeared outside Paris, then held by the English, a hundred men, women, and children, ‘good Christians from Lower Egypt, who were headed by a duke, an earl, and ten other horsemen. They told how the pope, after hearing their confession, gave them as penance to wander seven years without sleeping in a bed, and letters enjoining every bishop and mitred abbot to make them one payment of ten livres tournois.’

The Bourgeois of Paris, whose Journal records this visit with a Pepys-like fidelity, describes how multitudes ‘came from Paris, from Sainct Denis, and from the neighbourhood of Paris to see them. And it is true that the children, boys and girls, were as clever as could be. And most or nearly all had both ears pierced, and in each ear a silver ring, or two in each, and they said it was a sign of nobility in their own country. Item, the men were very black, their hair was frizzled; the women, the ugliest that could be seen, and the blackest. All had their faces covered with wounds (toutes avoient le visage deplaié), hair black as a horse’s tail, for sole dress an old blanket, very coarse, and fastened on the shoulder by a band of cloth or a cord, and underneath a shift, for all covering. In short, they were the poorest creatures ever seen in France in the memory of man. Yet, in spite of their poverty, there were witches among them who looked into people’s hands, and told what had happened to them, or would happen, and sowed discord in several marriages by saying to the husband, “Your wife has played you false,” or to the wife, “Your husband has played you false.” And what was worse, whilst they were speaking to folks, by magic or otherwise, or by the Enemy in Hell, or by dexterity and skill, it was said they emptied people’s purses and transferred the coin to their own. But in truth I went there three or four times to speak with them, yet never perceived that I lost a penny, nor did I ever see them look into a hand. But people said so everywhere, and it came to the ears of the Bishop of Paris, who went there, and took with him a Minorite friar called Little Jacobin. And he, by command of the bishop, made a fine preaching, excommunicating all who had believed them and shown them their hands. And they were obliged to depart, and departed on the day of Our Lady of September, and went away towards Pontoise.’

Three weeks later, at Amiens, Thomas, Earl of Little Egypt, with forty followers, received pious alms from the mayor and aldermen after exhibition of the papal letters; and during the next seven years we find similar scattered bands of Egyptians, Saracens from Egypt, or Heidens, at Tournai, Utrecht, Arnhem, Bommel, Middelburg, Metz, Leyden, Frankfort, etc. These, according to M. Bataillard, all belonged to the original band, some four hundred strong, which split up or reunited as occasion required, and which had probably started from the Balkan peninsula. The thirty tented Cingari or Cigäwnär, who encamped near Ratisbon in 1424 and 1426, seem on the other hand to have belonged to Hungary. Their leader had also a safe-conduct granted him at Zips on 23rd April 1423 by the Emperor Sigismund, and styling him ‘our faithful Ladislas, Woiwode of the Cigani’; and they gave out quite a different reason for their exile, that it was ‘in remembrance of the flight of our Lord into Egypt.’ The four hundred would-be pioneers, then, sent forward to spy out the lands of promise on behalf of vast hordes behind, who in 1438 began to pour over Germany, Italy, and France by thousands instead of by hundreds, and headed this time by King Zindl. Spain the Gypsies reached in 1447, Sweden by 1512, and Poland and Russia about 1501.

Francis Hindes Groome opens his 1899 collection with a frank admission: 'I am no folklorist; I have merely dabbled in folklore as a branch of the great Egyptian Question.' This self-deprecation belies a meticulous editorial hand. The volume gathers tales from Gypsy communities across Europe, with each story annotated to show parallels in other traditions. Groome's footnotes frequently cite sources like 'Denton’s Serbian Folklore' or refer to earlier tales in the collection, creating a web of cross-references that reward sequential reading.

The tales themselves are often stark and brutal. In 'The Rich and the Poor Brother,' a man trades his eyes for bread, is abandoned under a gallows, and overhears devils discussing cures for blindness, drought, and a princess's illness. The prose is lean, with dialogue stripped to essentials: 'Give me, too, a bit of bread.' 'If you will give me an eye, I will give you a bit of bread.' Such exchanges drive the narrative without embellishment.

Dialogue as Engine

Groome's tales rely heavily on direct speech to advance plot and reveal character. In 'The Rich and the Poor Brother,' the entire transaction of eyes for bread is conducted through terse negotiation: 'Give me, too, a bit of bread.' 'If you will give me an eye, I will give you a bit of bread.' The repetition of 'brother' throughout the dialogue underscores the betrayal. When the blind man later returns wealthy, his brother's question—'Where did you get it, the money, from, and the horses?'—is answered with a chillingly simple 'From there where you left me.' The devils' dialogue is equally functional: each reports a misdeed, and the chief devil responds with a remedy. No word is wasted; every line either demands, confesses, or instructs.

Recurring Motifs: Blinding and Restoration

Blinding appears as a literal transaction in 'The Rich and the Poor Brother,' where eyes are exchanged for bread. This motif recurs across the collection; Groome's footnotes trace it to other Gypsy and Balkan tales. The restoration of sight follows a supernatural eavesdropping scene: the blind man hears devils mention a brook that can heal him. The pattern—loss, hidden knowledge, recovery—is typical of the folk-tale logic Groome preserves. The eyes are not merely physical; they represent trust and fraternity, making their removal a stark symbol of broken bonds. The restoration, achieved through overheard devilish gossip, suggests that redemption comes from unlikely sources.

The Devil's Council as Plot Device

In 'The Rich and the Poor Brother,' the climax hinges on a devil's council under the gallows. Each devil reports a crime: stopping water, tormenting a princess, and a brother blinding another. The chief devil then reveals the cure for each affliction. This structure—a supernatural gathering that dispenses solutions—appears in multiple tales, as Groome notes in his cross-references. The devils are not tempters but informants; their knowledge is neutral, available to anyone who listens. The blind man's success depends on his accidental eavesdropping, not on moral virtue. This narrative device allows the hero to gain power without active heroism, a subtle inversion of typical fairy-tale agency.

Groome's Editorial Voice

Groome's presence is felt through footnotes that compare variants and cite sources like 'Denton’s Serbian Folklore' or earlier tales in the volume. He addresses the reader directly in the preface, lamenting that 'much has perished that folklorists should not have willingly let go.' His dedication to 'MM. Cosquin, Clodd, Jacobs, and Lang' signals his intended audience: fellow folklorists, not general readers. The notes are precise, often pointing out parallels in Hungarian-Gypsy or Welsh-Gypsy traditions. This scholarly apparatus transforms the collection from mere entertainment into a comparative study, though the tales themselves remain raw and unpolished, preserving the oral texture Groome valued.

Readers approaching this collection should expect neither polished literary fairy tales nor a unified narrative. Groome's work is a scholarly compendium, best read with attention to the footnotes and cross-references. The tales reward those who track recurring motifs—blinding, devilish councils, magical cures—across different cultural variants. The stark dialogue and repetitive structures may feel alien to those accustomed to literary retellings, but they offer a rare glimpse into the oral tradition as it was recorded in the late nineteenth century.

There’s something about Groome’s old Gypsy tales—the way they keep their secrets in plain sight, the hard justice meted out at the end—that stays with me long after closing the book. I find myself thinking of another quiet collection, Deccan Nursery Tales; or, Fairy Tales from the South — Context and Discussion, where the same stubborn kindness flickers through simpler words, as if both worlds were whispering to each other across the years.

David Johnson
1 month ago

Ella Clark
4 weeks ago

Lucas Robinson
1 month ago

4.5
4.5 out of 5 (8 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Angela Sanchez - 3 weeks ago
    The stories are presented without any contextual information, which is a missed opportunity. The translation feels stiff and loses the liveliness of oral storytelling. Many tales are short and don't leave a lasting impression. It could be much better with proper footnotes and a smoother translation.

  • ...
    Sherry Vasquez - 2 weeks ago
    A fascinating collection of Gypsy folk tales that offers a rare glimpse into a rich storytelling tradition. The tales are full of magic, wit, and cultural insights. The translator has preserved the authenticity and spirit of the original narratives, making this an invaluable resource for folklorists and casual readers alike.

  • ...
    Jacob Cabrera - 2 weeks ago
    The collection is diverse, with many interesting stories, but the translation can be inconsistent. Some tales are more engaging than others, and the lack of annotations leaves some cultural references unexplained. Still, it's a valuable book for anyone curious about Gypsy culture.


Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks